In today's world, File talk:Clementine walking dead.png is a topic that has generated great interest and debate in various spheres of society. With the increasing importance of File talk:Clementine walking dead.png in everyday life, it is essential to understand its implications and consequences in order to address it effectively. In this article, we will explore the different facets of File talk:Clementine walking dead.png, analyzing its impact in different areas and offering perspectives that contribute to enriching knowledge on this topic. From its origin to its evolution today, File talk:Clementine walking dead.png continues to be a relevant topic that deserves our attention and reflection.
This file does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This file is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This file is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
Which version to use
It makes absolutely no sense to use an out-of-date, aesthetically-poor photo for a character who has considerably evolved since their original appearance. Nearly every other article on a fictional character that I could find uses either the most recent version or at least a more recent version of the character in question. It's not at all educational and if anything, is misleading as it implies that Clementine literally hasn't changed since Season 1... which was 10+ years ago. TheCelebrinator (talk) 10:27, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
If the character has changed that much, you can upload an additional image and post it in the article in the appropriate chapter. — Ирука1319:35, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
It makes no sense to go by 'first appearance' photo when the purpose of the article is to be educational – that is, to use a cover photo for the subject that is widely recognizable or used. Does Batman still go by his 1939 appearance? What about Mickey Mouse? As Clementine has since greatly evolved since 2012, her appearance in Season 1 should no longer be considered 'standard'. You'll find that every other article on a fictional character uses a more up-to-date version of the subject. Even Lee's article does, as linked above, so this is very much inconsistent with the norms of Wikipedia.
For the sake of compromise, I've used a picture that at least is better taken ie: that doesn't portray Clementine as a wide-eyed scared little girl... which is the opposite of what her character has grown into. TheCelebrinator (talk) 20:31, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Batman: many appearances in one article; there are additional articles with appearances. The image in the infobox is from ten years ago. And, judging by the comment that was added when changing the image, it could be even older.
Mickey Mouse: the year is not given, but it also does not look particularly modern. Plus, again, many different looks in the article.
Batman's character has greatly evolved since 1939, his first appearance. Likewise, so has Mickey Mouse, and so has virtually every other fictional character, including Clementine. It's not about how old the image is as much as it is about how old it is relative to the character's existence.
A quick Google search of "Clementine twd" or any variation thereof yields many, many images of Clementine from Season 4... and very few from Season 1. Quite simply, more people recognize Clementine from her more recent appearances, which are now standard. Our policy is to use the most common, widely recognized image of the subject. TheCelebrinator (talk) 21:30, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Let's assume that's it for a minute, as you say: since the character has changed a lot, why don't you add another image to the article (WP:NFC allows it)? — Ирука1321:59, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Because our standard policy is to use the best image available for the infobox. It's literally the first thing any reader will see upon clicking on the article. It's also what we do with other articles/characters. TheCelebrinator (talk) 22:23, 30 July 2023 (UTC)