_ _    _ _____  ___   __                       
 __      _(_) | _(_)___ / ( _ ) / /_   ___ ___  _ __ ___  
 \ \ /\ / / | |/ / | |_ \ / _ \| '_ \ / __/ _ \| '_ ` _ \ 
  \ V  V /| |   <| |___) | (_) | (_) | (_| (_) | | | | | |
   \_/\_/ |_|_|\_\_|____/ \___/ \___(_)___\___/|_| |_| |_|

File talk:Electromagnetic-Spectrum.png

In the wide world of File talk:Electromagnetic-Spectrum.png, there is a great diversity of approaches, opinions and perspectives. The complexity of this topic/individual/event has generated endless discussions and debates over time, becoming a central element in various areas of knowledge. From its impact on society to its influence on popular culture, File talk:Electromagnetic-Spectrum.png has captured the attention of scholars, experts, and fans alike. In this article, we will explore some of the most relevant and fascinating facets of File talk:Electromagnetic-Spectrum.png, analyzing its importance and implications in different contexts.

Can sb rotate the pic pls —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.132.106.168 (talk) 06:56, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Error in "The electromagnetic spectrum" image

380nm = 7.89*10^14Hz / 750nm = 3.99*10^14Hz / 299.8 = 1*10^15Hz / Frequency 1*10-15Hz is not in visible spectrum ! / Wavelength and frequency measures are erroneously shifted. Softvision (talk) 17:27, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Ask your question here Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Science, you'll get a faster response -- penubag  (talk) 18:28, 23 July 2009 (UTC)