_ _ _ _____ ___ __
__ _(_) | _(_)___ / ( _ ) / /_ ___ ___ _ __ ___
\ \ /\ / / | |/ / | |_ \ / _ \| '_ \ / __/ _ \| '_ ` _ \
\ V V /| | <| |___) | (_) | (_) | (_| (_) | | | | | |
\_/\_/ |_|_|\_\_|____/ \___/ \___(_)___\___/|_| |_| |_|
I would suggest to replace the picture with a picture highlighting the Vltava river instead of Labe. Despite their names Labe is a tributary of Vltava. If you want to have the real beginning of Labe (Elbe) on the picture, use picture with Vltava spring.
This is a historical mistake. All the pointers used when determining parent river and confluent speaks clearly. Vltava is the parent river as we can say based on the flow direction, amount of water and other indicators. When measuring long time ago a mistake was made.
I think its more common and appropriate to keep Labe as the only highlighted river.
I would suggest to add Silesia label as its is the third historical region of Czech Republic. Even though it now mainly lies in Poland, it is still taught at primary schools that Czech Republic consists of Bohemia, Moravia and Silesia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jirizita (talk • contribs) 23:54, 12 February 2009 (UTC)