File talk:Langhaar.jpg
In this article, we will explore in depth the relevance of File talk:Langhaar.jpg in different contexts and circumstances. From its impact on society to its influence on popular culture, File talk:Langhaar.jpg has left a significant mark on various aspects of everyday life. Through detailed analysis, we will examine the many facets of File talk:Langhaar.jpg and its importance in today's world. Furthermore, we will explore how File talk:Langhaar.jpg has evolved over time and what future projections can be anticipated in relation to this phenomenon. From its origin to its legacy, this article will provide a comprehensive view of File talk:Langhaar.jpg and its significance in the contemporary landscape.
 | This orphaned talk page, subpage, image page, or similar is not eligible for speedy deletion under CSD G8 as it has been asserted to be useful to Wikipedia. If you believe it should be deleted, please nominate it on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion. |
Copyvio
This photo is not own work. The uploader copied it from huwiki, but the Hungarian uploader did copyright violation, too. --Regasterios (talk) 08:59, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Regasterios: can you cite your reasons, please? This image has been around for 10 years and these are rarely copyright violations. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:22, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Magog the Ogre: This photo was not made by Cliché Online. He/she copied it from huwiki: hu:Fájl:Langhaar.jpg. Please, see the dates of uploading. Cliché Online signed a date when Lupusz (the Hungarian uploader) uploaded this photo on huwiki. I know it is not trouble per se. But please see what Lupusz uploaded from February 6 2008 to February 8 2008 (hu:Speciális:Fájlok_listája/Lupusz).
- hu:Fájl:Erdelyi kopo.jpg: no summary, but he claim by the license it is an own photo. OK, there are situations like this. But following by...
- hu:Fájl:Hannoveri vereb.jpg: no summary, but he claim by the license it is an own photo. But this photo is not own because of it have been on Commons from 2006: File:Hannoverscher Schweisshund.jpg.
- hu:Fájl:Jagd terrier.jpg: no summary, but he claim by the license it is an own photo. But this photo is not own because of it have been on Commons from 2006: File:Terier niemiecki myśliwski 721.jpg.
- hu:Fájl:Fox terrier.jpg: no summary, but he claim by the license it is an own photo. But this photo is not own because of it have been on Commons from 2006: File:Fox terrier smooth.jpg.
- hu:Fájl:Labrador retriever.jpg: no summary, but he claim by the license it is an own photo. But this photo is not own because of it have been on Commons from 2007: File:Labrador Retriever black portrait Flickr.jpg. And then...
- hu:Fájl:Langhaar.jpg: no summary, but he claim by the license it is an own photo...
Google finds this photo on many pages, it is true not before 2008. Perhaps the photo was in Commons too but was deleted. I don't know. But I know these circumstances are really very queer.
Finally compare these photos on Commons, see the dates and original uploaders: File:Duitse staande korthaar 10-10-2.jpg and File:Rovidszoru nemet vizsla.jpg. I think you don't need comment. --Regasterios (talk) 09:13, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
