_ _    _ _____  ___   __                       
 __      _(_) | _(_)___ / ( _ ) / /_   ___ ___  _ __ ___  
 \ \ /\ / / | |/ / | |_ \ / _ \| '_ \ / __/ _ \| '_ ` _ \ 
  \ V  V /| |   <| |___) | (_) | (_) | (_| (_) | | | | | |
   \_/\_/ |_|_|\_\_|____/ \___/ \___(_)___\___/|_| |_| |_|

File talk:Mickey's Twice upon a Christmas.jpg

In this article, the topic of File talk:Mickey's Twice upon a Christmas.jpg will be addressed from different perspectives and approaches. File talk:Mickey's Twice upon a Christmas.jpg is a topic of great relevance today, which has captured the attention of experts, researchers and the general public. Throughout history, File talk:Mickey's Twice upon a Christmas.jpg has been the subject of numerous studies, debates and reflections, demonstrating the importance of understanding its impact and reach. In this sense, the main objective of this article is to analyze the different dimensions of File talk:Mickey's Twice upon a Christmas.jpg, offering a comprehensive overview that allows readers to understand its meaning, implications and possible repercussions in different areas of society. In addition, new research and discoveries will be presented that expand our understanding of File talk:Mickey's Twice upon a Christmas.jpg, offering an updated and enriching view on this very relevant topic.

Fair use?

I have no real dog in the fight over whether this image should be used. Rather, my dog is that File:Mickey's Twice Upon a Christmas.jpg, like the article “Mickey's Twice Upon a Christmas”, was mistitled. I moved the latter to “Mickey's Twice upon a Christmas”. Because the former could not be moved, I cloned it with proper title.

If this file is deleted, then please consider whether File:Mickey's Twice Upon a Christmas.jpg should likewise be deleted. Also, a link to the image will need to be removed from the article “Mickey's Twice Upon a Christmas”. —SlamDiego←T 17:25, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Well, User:ESkog appears to have rendered the question of File:Mickey's Twice Upon a Christmas.jpg moot, as he or she deleted it. Again, I don't feel a need to defend the existence of this file; I just want it properly titled if it exists. —SlamDiego←T 17:31, 27 December 2008 (UTC)