_ _    _ _____  ___   __                       
 __      _(_) | _(_)___ / ( _ ) / /_   ___ ___  _ __ ___  
 \ \ /\ / / | |/ / | |_ \ / _ \| '_ \ / __/ _ \| '_ ` _ \ 
  \ V  V /| |   <| |___) | (_) | (_) | (_| (_) | | | | | |
   \_/\_/ |_|_|\_\_|____/ \___/ \___(_)___\___/|_| |_| |_|

File talk:Nuclear weapons states.svg

In today's world, File talk:Nuclear weapons states.svg is a topic that has captured the attention of millions of people around the world. With its multiple facets and implications, File talk:Nuclear weapons states.svg has become a key point of discussion in various fields, from politics to science, culture and society in general. Throughout history, File talk:Nuclear weapons states.svg has played a crucial role in the evolution of humanity, marking important milestones and generating significant changes in the way we see and understand the world around us. In this article, we will explore the different dimensions of File talk:Nuclear weapons states.svg and analyze its impact on our current reality.

what's that country in south america? part of france or something? is it necessary to have it coloured in? a little confusing, no?

Yes it is necessary to have French Guiana/Guyana (aka Guyane) coulored in-Dan —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.14.156.140 (talk) 16:56, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Shouldn't Israel be black- 'accused of having nuclear weapons' - since they haven't admitted they have them, yet?bob bobato (talk) 00:13, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

No, black is for countries suspected of having nuclear weapons programs. Israel is yellow because it is an undeclared nuclear weapons state.

Libya

libya too formerly possesed nuke weapons —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.142.136.245 (talk) 08:08, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

No. Libya was building nukes until 2003, but never successfully built one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.235.87.227 (talk) 16:56, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

greece, and canada

both had nuclear weapons at one time, Canada got rid of them in 1984, and greece in 2001--75.63.2.206 (talk) 21:46, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

That's a little different from South Africa and the former Soviet republics because the nukes in Canada and Greece were American property, whereas the nukes in South Africa and the former Soviet republics were the property of those countries.

Burma

Burma should be included in the category: States accused of having nuclear weapon programs.

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2010/04/19/intelligence-agencies-warn-burma-budding-rogue-nuclear-state/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.235.87.227 (talk) 06:32, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

http://www.globalsecuritynewswire.org/gsn/nw_20100604_5280.php — Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.235.86.241 (talk) 19:36, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

http://www.dvb.no/news/n-korea-burma-nuke-fears-grow/13357 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.235.86.241 (talk) 20:41, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Former "Sharing" states?

Should this not be updates to include states (countries) that used to "share" nuclear weapons, like Canada who as part of Norad maintained a nuclear arsenal on "loan" from the us? I am not familiar with updating maps and whatnot.--Notwillywanka (talk) 19:31, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikious
Boobota
Sagapedia