In the article below, we will delve into the fascinating world of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Angels Flight.jpg. From its origins to its impact on today's society, we will explore the many facets of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Angels Flight.jpg and discover how it has influenced different aspects of everyday life. Through this detailed analysis, we hope to provide a complete and enriching insight into Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Angels Flight.jpg, allowing our readers to understand its importance and relevance in today's world.
Nominate and support. --SPUI (talk) 10:39, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
The light in the foreground was a bit too dark. I've brightened it up somewhat and also sharpened a little bit the image. JoJan 14:04, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
New version is much worse. It's been shrunk, and lightening loses detail in the highlights. --jacobolus(t) 02:12, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. Nothing here to make me go "wow". Denni☯ 01:11, 2005 Apr 1 (UTC)
Oppose. It's a cool thing, but the composition of this photo isn't spectacular. --jacobolus(t) 02:12, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. Needs perspective correction, and too busy. The sign in the lower right and the staircase landing and foliage on the lower left are especially distracting. —Korath (Talk) 01:26, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. Agree with above. Enochlau 03:59, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Not promoted +1/-4BrokenSegue 14:43, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)