This article will address the topic of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Arthur-James-Balfour-1st-Earl-of-Balfour.jpg, which has gained relevance in various areas in recent years. Since its emergence, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Arthur-James-Balfour-1st-Earl-of-Balfour.jpg has captured the attention of academics, experts and the general public, generating controversy and debate around its implications and consequences. Throughout the next lines, different perspectives and approaches related to Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Arthur-James-Balfour-1st-Earl-of-Balfour.jpg, as well as its impact on society, economy and culture, will be explored. Through a detailed and rigorous analysis, the aim is to shed light on this topic and contribute to the understanding and reflection on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Arthur-James-Balfour-1st-Earl-of-Balfour.jpg.
Oppose I don't see what makes this image "above and beyond". It's a picture of Balfour but I don't see how it has much more EV than any other decent quality picture of him. Visually, the crop is too close IMO. (t · c) buidhe03:55, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
@Buidhe, I chose to restore this photo of Balfour partly because it was already present on his Wikidata profile, but also because it's (imo) the best photo we have of him. The other possible one would be File:A.J. Balfour LCCN2014682753 (cropped).jpg, but the photograph itself is more blurry and he's not looking into the camera. As for the crop, it was directly pulled from National Portrait Gallery website, so I'm assuming the only other content of the photo is a border. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 14:37, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}