_ _    _ _____  ___   __                       
 __      _(_) | _(_)___ / ( _ ) / /_   ___ ___  _ __ ___  
 \ \ /\ / / | |/ / | |_ \ / _ \| '_ \ / __/ _ \| '_ ` _ \ 
  \ V  V /| |   <| |___) | (_) | (_) | (_| (_) | | | | | |
   \_/\_/ |_|_|\_\_|____/ \___/ \___(_)___\___/|_| |_| |_|

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Aust blue dragonfly02.jpg

In this article we will explore everything related to Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Aust blue dragonfly02.jpg, from its origin and evolution to its impact on today's society. Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Aust blue dragonfly02.jpg is a topic that has generated great interest and debate in different circles, whether in the academic, social or professional field. Over the years, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Aust blue dragonfly02.jpg has been the subject of multiple investigations and studies that have contributed to expanding our knowledge on this topic. Furthermore, its relevance today makes it a topic of great importance for understanding the world in which we live. Throughout this article, we will examine in detail all the relevant aspects of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Aust blue dragonfly02.jpg and its influence on our daily lives.
1 - Blue Dragonfly
2 - Blue Dragonfly

Two great images (sorry Solipsist :-) ), of a Blue Dragonfly.

  • Support. Self Nom. --Fir0002 07:55, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Support #1 Image:Aust blue dragonfly02.jpg -- Chris 73 Talk 11:35, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC)
  • I'd support #1 Image:Aust blue dragonfly02.jpg if it appeared in an article. —Korath (Talk) 15:09, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC)
  • Support when placed in a proper article. -- BRIAN0918  17:50, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Support if it meets the criterion of illustrating an article. Denni 02:10, 2005 Mar 4 (UTC)
  • Support I support the first one, the second one isn't quite as good. But I'm generally quite impressed. G-Man 22:24, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Support The first one is an awesome shot - agree with G-man. -Lommer | talk 01:20, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Support only the first one. The second shot could use some enhancing. JoJan 17:18, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Support #1 - Bevo 16:41, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Support either. Nice pictures. But is there a higher resolution version? --jacobolus (t) 23:45, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
    • Promoted: +10 / - 0 -- Solipsist 20:23, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)