In today's world, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Castle Bravo Shrimp Device 002.jpg is a topic of great relevance and interest to many people. Throughout history, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Castle Bravo Shrimp Device 002.jpg has played a fundamental role in society, culture and people's daily lives. Since its origins, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Castle Bravo Shrimp Device 002.jpg has generated debate, controversy and fascination, becoming a reference point to better understand the world around us. In this article, we will explore the different facets of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Castle Bravo Shrimp Device 002.jpg, analyzing its impact on various aspects of society and the individual. Through a multidisciplinary approach, we will discover the multiple dimensions and perspectives that Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Castle Bravo Shrimp Device 002.jpg offers, thus enriching our knowledge and understanding of this significant topic.
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2021 at 02:23:17 (UTC)
Reason
This image depicts the second thermonuclear weapon ever tested and the first "dry" thermonuclear weapon, with dry weapons being the basis of all modern nuclear weapons. It is of great historical significance and provides the viewer with an understanding of the small size of what was a very powerful device. From a scientific and engineering standpoint, the image makes clear the vacuum line of sight pipes attached to the device which where used for device diagnostics during the test, along with other hardware.
Articles in which this image appears
Castle Bravo, Operation Castle. In both cases the image is somewhat overtaken by two other highly iconic images.
It needs a bit of restoration, which I volunteer to do if there are a couple supports. I probably support later after I look into the article. Bammesk (talk)
Kylesenior, yes normally we remove such IDs, example . When a text is an integral part of the image then we keep it, examples . In this case I don't have a strong preference either way. If some of you want to keep the government's photo ID, I will upload another restored version with the ID. I added it to the file's description on Commons. Bammesk (talk) 02:53, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Tyrone, a repeat vote isn't helpful. You need to indicate which version you are voting for: the original or the restored? Or which version you prefer? Bammesk (talk) 03:42, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Comment - If people have a better suggestion/better wording for the caption, I would like to hear it. Both the description used here and on Commons.Kylesenior (talk) 03:23, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
@Armbrust:, I restored the edits made by User:Tyrone Madera to their original form, diff 1diff 2. In counting the votes, I see 4.5 support votes for the Original image (by users Kylesenior, Tyrone Madera, Kavyansh.Singh, MER-C, Cwmhiraeth), and I see 5 support votes for the Restored image (by users Bammesk, Kavyansh.Singh, Janke, MER-C, Tyrone Madera). I see sufficient clarity to close this nom. If you have any concerns, please let me know. Thanks. Bammesk (talk) 02:08, 2 November 2021 (UTC)