In the article we present below, we delve into the fascinating world of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Denver Lightning.jpg, exploring its origins, its impact on today's society and its possible future challenges. Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Denver Lightning.jpg has been the subject of interest and study for decades, piquing the curiosity of researchers and hobbyists alike. Throughout this writing, we will closely examine the multiple facets that make up Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Denver Lightning.jpg, from its most relevant aspects to its implications in various areas of daily life. Through a deep and insightful analysis, we seek to provide a complete and enriching vision of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Denver Lightning.jpg, with the aim of giving the reader a broader and more meaningful understanding of this exciting topic.
support What is your subject? Denver or lightning? I cannot vote unless I know this. The image only appears in the Denver article, so if Denver is the subject I must oppose as Denver is not well depicted. However if this image was used on the lightning article, I would probably support it as lightning is very well depicted. HighInBC16:06, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Support I was very pleased to have discovered this image at the commons. I think that it is well depicted and really just a cool photo in general. Editor19841 (talk) 23:18, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Support. Not a bad representation of a lightning strike, but is it the best Wikipedia has to offer? I'm sure there are better lightning images out there. --Tewy04:32, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Weak oppose. I like the image, but it neither illustrates Denver or Thunderstorm well. The best thing it illustrates is Lightning but it's not in that article, and there are better lightning pictures there anyway. howcheng {chat}21:01, 29 September 2006 (UTC)