_ _    _ _____  ___   __                       
 __      _(_) | _(_)___ / ( _ ) / /_   ___ ___  _ __ ___  
 \ \ /\ / / | |/ / | |_ \ / _ \| '_ \ / __/ _ \| '_ ` _ \ 
  \ V  V /| |   <| |___) | (_) | (_) | (_| (_) | | | | | |
   \_/\_/ |_|_|\_\_|____/ \___/ \___(_)___\___/|_| |_| |_|

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Holy Basil flowers.jpg

In this article we will delve into Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Holy Basil flowers.jpg, a topic of great relevance today. Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Holy Basil flowers.jpg is a point of interest that has captured the attention of experts, academics and the general public due to its impact on various aspects of daily life. Through detailed analysis and exhaustive exploration of its different aspects, we seek to better understand the implications of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Holy Basil flowers.jpg in today's world. Furthermore, we will examine its evolution over time and its influence in different fields, in order to offer a comprehensive vision that enriches the debate around this topic. Without a doubt, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Holy Basil flowers.jpg is a topic that arouses great interest and controversy, so it is essential to address it with the seriousness and depth it deserves.
Original - Ocimum tenuiflorum, Holy Basil flowers in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
Reason
Good quality, EV and composition. Compare with my previous image in the article
Articles in which this image appears
Ocimum tenuiflorum
Creator
Muhammad Mahdi Karim
  • Support as nominator --Muhammad(talk) 17:41, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Support Lighting in this image is much better than the last FPC. I also like having a bit of nature in the background. The very top of the flower is out of focus, but the majority of it is there. Jujutacular T · C 23:36, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose: I find the flash lighting and dark background somewhat "unpleasant". Was there a good reason for doing it this way? Maedin\talk 06:27, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
    • Small aperture was required to get the whole inflorescence into focus. Windy conditions = faster shutter = dark bg. FWIW, it's a lot better than the previously nominated picture which almost passed --Muhammad(talk) 07:25, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
      • I realised the small aperture and would have forgiven that on its own. Thanks for explaining the windy conditions, and I do appreciate that it's much better than the previously nominated image. But I think I'll stick with my oppose for aforementioned reasons. Maedin\talk 07:34, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Not promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 07:08, 15 April 2010 (UTC)