In the article we present today we are going to address the topic of
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Jesse Owens1.jpg, a topic that has aroused the interest of many people throughout history.
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Jesse Owens1.jpg is a complex and fascinating topic that covers a wide range of aspects and has repercussions in various areas of society. Over the years,
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Jesse Owens1.jpg has been the subject of numerous studies, debates and controversies, which has contributed to enriching our understanding of this topic. In this article, we propose to explore different facets related to
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Jesse Owens1.jpg, from its origin to its impact today, offering a comprehensive vision and diverse perspectives that allow the reader to delve into this exciting topic.
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2012 at 11:07:05 (UTC)
- Reason
- A very valuable image of a historic event, which is used in many articles, with nice composition and dynamism that adds to the EV. Relatively high technical quality for a historic image.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Jesse Owens, African American, 1930s, Jesse Owens Award, List of Congressional Gold Medal recipients, Ohio State Buckeyes, Timeline of African-American Civil Rights Movement
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Sport
- Creator
- Unknown
- Neutral on Original. Pretty iconic image, but agree that I'd like to see a re-edit. The hi-res TIFF isn't particularly great quality (due to print quality of original source), but it looks like more could be done with it. I'm not sure if this is available from another original source with better print quality. The blacks on this restoration have also been made too heavy. In fact I'd probably be more inclined to support a fairly simple edit of the TIFF with little more than a crop and straighten. --jjron (talk) 13:06, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
- As you suggested, I've added an alt. Tomer T (talk) 13:27, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Weak Support Alt. Could probably do with a bit of a dust and scratch removal on the Alt still, and not sure there wouldn't be a better original print around to scan, but other values compensate. Please count as 'full support' if this comes down to a borderline decision. --jjron (talk) 13:15, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry, where's this TIFF you're talking about? Aaadddaaammm (talk) 17:47, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
- Support Edit only. Good scan of a very historic photo.
-
Didn't the image pass? Tomer T (talk) 19:10, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- I don't close noms usually, but if we're going by vote counting there's only 4.5 of the necessary 5 supports. Clegs (talk) 08:39, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
- Consider what Jjron said:
Weak Support Alt. Could probably do with a bit of a dust and scratch removal on the Alt still, and not sure there wouldn't be a better original print around to scan, but other values compensate. Please count as 'full support' if this comes down to a borderline decision. --jjron (talk) 13:15, 7 March 2012 (UTC) (emphasis added)
- I count five votes if jjron's comment is taken into consideration. Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:55, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
- In response to a request to comment on my talkpage by Crisco to clarify my vote, yes, count mine as full support (I can hardly retract now); I'll strike the weak to make it easier. I still maintain that it could be tweaked to improve it, or possibly a better copy could be found. However I did a quick web search and can't find anything noticeably better - anything that potentially looked to be higher quality in thumb was far too small. If a better version comes along, a D&R would be easily done. --jjron (talk) 14:37, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
Promoted File:Jesse Owens3.jpg --Julia\talk 17:18, 18 March 2012 (UTC)