The importance of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Junonia villida tas.jpg in contemporary society is undeniable. Whether professionally, culturally, personally or politically, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Junonia villida tas.jpg has a significant impact on our lives. As technology advances, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Junonia villida tas.jpg continues to be relevant and its influence becomes increasingly evident. In this article, we will explore the role and importance of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Junonia villida tas.jpg in different contexts, analyzing its evolution over time and its impact on the world today. Additionally, we will examine how Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Junonia villida tas.jpg has shaped the way we think, act and relate, and how we can harness its potential to promote change and progress in society.
Compliments the other images in the article, showing it with closed wings (quite a common resting position). The image has good lighting and is very detailed thanks to a focus stack. I don't think that the decayed wingtips are a major issue, it is quite common as butterflies age.
I didn't crop it beyond the actual shot. I might have a bit more background that I could stitch in since I took quite a number to ensure a successful handheld stack. Noodle snacks (talk) 23:13, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
I meant, the damaged wings was probably one of the reasons why the butterfly was photographed so well since its flight would have been affected and it would thus sit around --Muhammad(talk)04:34, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Weak Support Not sure the EV is the best with the wings closed but quality is there. 180mm seems to be pretty good? --Fir000205:34, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Snot bad. Working distance is the main benefit. The bokeh is pretty nice too. The autofocus is bad, but I don't use it for non macro so no big deal. This and the Teatree image above are proof that handheld focus stacks are quite possible if you keep it to a low number of shots. Noodle snacks (talk) 04:53, 30 April 2009 (UTC)