Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:RAN squirrel helicopter at melb GP 08.jpg
Currently, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:RAN squirrel helicopter at melb GP 08.jpg is a topic that has gained great relevance in various areas of society. From politics to popular culture, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:RAN squirrel helicopter at melb GP 08.jpg has become a point of constant interest and debate. Over time, interest in Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:RAN squirrel helicopter at melb GP 08.jpg has increased, leading to deeper research and the generation of discussions around its importance and repercussions. In this article, we will explore different perspectives and approaches related to Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:RAN squirrel helicopter at melb GP 08.jpg, in order to offer a broader and more detailed vision on this topic that is so relevant today.
Comment The angle is slightly unhappy because it leads to one of the rotors overlapping the tail as well as over underexposure of large parts of the underside and sides - the farther landing skid has been reduced to a mere silhouette. This all leads to a snapshotty feel overall imo. Approaching the aerospace industry and military with requests for pictures may yield much better material than this. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 09:34, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
On the other hand the angle is slightly happy because it makes the object 3D rather than 2D-side-on-portrait. It's also from a top down rather than a overhead angle which elevates it from snapshot level IMO. I'm assuming you mean under exposure right? Still plenty of detail there - I'll run the standard suggestion of getting your monitor calibrated. If you don't believe me bump up the gamma or something in your image editor of choice. --Fir000213:52, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Support Great angle. The farther landing skid is not a problem even if underexposed since you can see perfectly the other one. Franklin.vp 15:28, 27 August 2009 (UTC)