_ _    _ _____  ___   __                       
 __      _(_) | _(_)___ / ( _ ) / /_   ___ ___  _ __ ___  
 \ \ /\ / / | |/ / | |_ \ / _ \| '_ \ / __/ _ \| '_ ` _ \ 
  \ V  V /| |   <| |___) | (_) | (_) | (_| (_) | | | | | |
   \_/\_/ |_|_|\_\_|____/ \___/ \___(_)___\___/|_| |_| |_|

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Flaming cocktails.jpg

In today's world, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Flaming cocktails.jpg is a topic or person that generates great interest and controversy. Its impact is felt in different areas, from politics to popular culture. Knowing more about Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Flaming cocktails.jpg has become crucial to understanding the society in which we live. In this article, we will thoroughly explore who Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Flaming cocktails.jpg is, his relevance today, and his influence on different aspects of everyday life. Additionally, we will analyze how Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Flaming cocktails.jpg has evolved over time, and what we can expect from its future. Join us on this tour to discover everything you need to know about Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Flaming cocktails.jpg.
"Flaming" cocktails contain a small amount of flammable high-proof alcohol which is ignited prior to consumption. (Warning: Full image is 900KiB, see also 800x600 rendering)
a Wikipedia:Featured picture

PD image, doesn't really need any explanation, just very cool. ed g2stalk 20:55, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)

  • Nominate and support - ed g2stalk 20:55, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Support. James F. (talk) 23:07, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Support. Rdsmith4Dan | Talk 03:58, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Support. But can the 900kB be compressed a bit? -- Chris 73 Talk 04:15, Nov 15, 2004 (UTC)
  • Support only after a bit of cropping is done in order to reduce the file size. --] 09:46, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Support, but Oppose if compressed or cropped and recompressed (note that JPEGs can be cropped losslessly), already grainy enough. — David Remahl 12:18, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
    • Agreed; the image can be shrunk when people want to use it, but it should not be mutilated. James F. (talk) 14:15, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Support if cropped. Denni 16:57, 2004 Nov 15 (UTC)
  • support, but it really should be centered. Cavebear42 17:42, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Support. Very interesting and the off centre isn't at all bad. I like the background alot. --Fir0002 22:44, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Support. Very different than the stuff we ususally see nominated. Very cool. --ScottyBoy900Q 03:58, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Support, only if not cropped. Should not be shrunk either. zoney talk 13:59, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Comment. At the moment we should be voting on the original, when it has gone through if people think its too large for en., we can move it to commons and have a scaled down version here. I've added a half size render for dialups. ed g2stalk 14:01, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Support if it is not cropped or centered. Looks great as it is.—Ëzhiki (erinaceus europeaus) 18:03, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)
  • Support. Don't change a thing, it's perfect. --Barfooz 06:26, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Support. -- Solipsist 08:02, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Support as-is. - RedWordSmith 03:48, Nov 20, 2004 (UTC)
  • Support. I especially like the off-center composition, also nice colors. ] 12:31, Nov 20, 2004 (UTC)
  • Support, no changes. ] 03:10, Nov 22, 2004 (UTC)
  • Support. Do not crop. --MarkSweep 21:28, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Support! But do not modify, leave as-is. --Jcmaco | Talk 05:17, Nov 28, 2004 (UTC)
  • Promoted, +18/-0. -- ] 07:27, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)