Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Gold Coast (from The Spit).jpg
In the article we present today we want to address the topic of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Gold Coast (from The Spit).jpg from a broad and varied perspective. Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Gold Coast (from The Spit).jpg is a topic that has generated great interest and debate over the years, covering different aspects and triggering multiple reflections. In this sense, we propose to analyze in depth the various aspects that Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Gold Coast (from The Spit).jpg presents, as well as its implications in today's society. To do this, we will examine different approaches and opinions of experts on the subject, in order to offer a complete and truthful vision of this very relevant topic. Through an exhaustive analysis, we aim to provide our readers with a broad and updated vision of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Gold Coast (from The Spit).jpg, with the aim of promoting critical and enriching reflection.
Gold Coast (from The Spit)
I don't think that this photo lives up to featured picture standards. Not very contrasty, and there is too much sky (IMO).
If you checked the archived discussion from this page from when we did the big renomination, you'd find . Just so you know. ed g2s • talk11:25, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
I've forgotten how we do de-listings. Surely some sort of tag or note should be placed on the image page to alert the original contributor and anyone else watching it. -- Solipsist08:05, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
AFAIK we don't do delist that much, so there isn't a set of templates, or procedure for notifying the uploader. Feel free to create them. ed g2s • talk12:31, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
Keep - From the image's info page "This photo was taken the morning after a wild storm. I think it shows the essence of the Gold Coast, perched on the shore, the buildings disappearing into the sea-spray". - Bevo16:00, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Pretty in pastels, and adds significantly to Gold Coast. --Andrew 00:55, May 6, 2005 (UTC)
Keep. It caught a moment of beauty. And it should not be artificially "enhanced." Pollinator 21:26, May 7, 2005 (UTC)
Delist. It's all right, but if you let this kind of picture be featured, then the standards aren't high enough to bar any picture. Deltabeignet22:38, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
I don't see any technical problem in this picture nor any problem in composition... So what ? it's pastel and people like saturated colors ? Ericd14:43, 16 May 2005 (UTC)