In today's world, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Gospers glider gun.gif is a topic that has captured the attention of many people. Whether it is its impact on society, its relevance today, or its connection to historical events, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Gospers glider gun.gif is something we cannot ignore. In this article, we will explore in depth the different aspects of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Gospers glider gun.gif, from its origin and evolution to its influence in different areas of life. We'll also look at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Gospers glider gun.gif's changing perspectives over time and its impact today. Through this analysis, we hope to provide a comprehensive view of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Gospers glider gun.gif and its importance in the modern world.
This image isn't one of wikipedia's most visually stunning images; but it adds significantly to the Conway's Game of Life article. Visualizing Conway's rules in action is something text simply cannot do. Also it is, in it's own way, very interesting to look at. This image was created by User:Kieff and is released under the GFDL.
Yeah, it really should be bigger; I can barely see it at its proper size. It could also use some explanation in the image page as to what is actually happening. Raven4x4x05:53, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
Geez, don't let size be an issue. I expanded it 500%. I just thought that uploading a small, 1x1 version would let us expand it (using thumb|__px) at will. About a description, I think that's a great idea. ☢ Ҡieff⌇↯08:59, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
I thought that Featured Pictures were considered in the context of the page they are in. In that page it was already bigger as explained above. Regardless, it has been resized now. --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 17:25, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
Support. I'm still a little confused and I don't think that article is descriptive enough...but it still illustrates the subject pretty darn well. I agree that this just can't be looked at in any other way than a simple animation like this. --ScottyBoy900Q∞00:01, 30 October 2005 (UTC)