In today's world, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Australian wood duck - male.jpg has become a topic of general interest to a wide variety of people. From experts in the field to those who simply want to stay on top of the latest trends, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Australian wood duck - male.jpg has caught the attention of many. With its impact on society and different aspects of daily life, it is undeniable that Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Australian wood duck - male.jpg represents an important talking point today. Whether due to its historical relevance, its influence on popular culture or its importance in the academic field, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Australian wood duck - male.jpg is a topic that continues to generate interest and debate. In this article, we will thoroughly explore the meaning of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Australian wood duck - male.jpg and its impact in different areas, providing an overview that allows readers to better understand its importance and relevance in the contemporary world.
Neutral It's a beautiful picture (and I'd add, as often), but I think it should be sharper at that size. I miss some details and texture on the legs, but maybe I'm asking too much which is why I don't oppose. Blieusong (talk) 11:23, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
It certainly is a good picture, but featuring 1.6MP photos which are not completely sharp is pretty 2005. Ack Blieusong. --Dschwen14:15, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Support The important part is sharp. It's arty. I love the composition, the colour, the background diffusion to copy a couple of other support votes above. I love the result of the composition and will strongly oppose any sharpening. Blow it up big and enter it in a an art photo contest, also. --Blechnic (talk) 06:37, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Support I like the sharpness of this picture, not to mention the cuteness of the subject. I think it deserves to be an FP. Elephantissimo (talk) 22:57, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Oppose DOF makes me feel like I'm supposed to be looking at the grass or just the front part of the body. Other images in the article appear equally good.Greener Cactus (talk) 20:35, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
