Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Burnie CBD and Port Panorama.jpg
In today's world, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Burnie CBD and Port Panorama.jpg is a topic that sparks great interest and debate. The importance of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Burnie CBD and Port Panorama.jpg has been increasing in recent years, and its influence extends to multiple areas of society. From the scientific to the political, cultural and social spheres, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Burnie CBD and Port Panorama.jpg has become a crucial issue that leaves no one indifferent. In this article, we will explore the different facets of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Burnie CBD and Port Panorama.jpg, analyzing its impact and repercussions in different spheres. In addition, we will delve into its evolution throughout history and the future perspectives it offers.
- Reason
- High Quality and informative for the related articles
- Articles this image appears in
- Burnie, Bass Strait
- Creator
- Noodle snacks
- Support as nominator --Noodle snacks (talk) 11:28, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose this one, the composition feels unbalanced, kind of missing the bottom of the image. Got a better one? --Janke | Talk 12:51, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose The Earth is round....The too flat horizontal line looks unreal and seems like stretched by Atlas's hands...--Caspian blue 20:11, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Try moving the image back and forth sideways (In a larger zoom). You can see the horizon rise and fall. I think its appropriate for this kind of image. A curve too drastic would decrease the image's quality. SpencerT♦C 22:28, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- I already did before commenting here.--Caspian blue 22:47, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Try moving the image back and forth sideways (In a larger zoom). You can see the horizon rise and fall. I think its appropriate for this kind of image. A curve too drastic would decrease the image's quality. SpencerT♦C 22:28, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- The earth may be round, but the curvature of the earth is not going to be visible until you get to a significant altitude, never mind sea level. A scene such as this should certainly have a flat horizon for enc value as it would not have appeared curved to the naked eye. We would oppose a curved land horizon for sure, and a sea horizon should be the same. If the image were taken from several tens of thousands feet then a properly visible curve might be acceptable. Mfield (talk) 16:34, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose Decent EV, but poor time of day for photography - the lighting is just too harsh with bright roofs, unappealing skyline and strong shadows. Also there appears to be some posterization in the sky (~1000px from the LHS) --Fir0002 04:10, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Not promoted MER-C 23:58, 19 November 2008 (UTC)