Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Medal of Honor flag.png
In this article, we will explore the topic of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Medal of Honor flag.png in depth. From its origins to its relevance today, we will put under the magnifying glass all aspects related to Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Medal of Honor flag.png. Our goal is to offer our readers a complete and detailed view of this topic, providing invaluable information that allows them to better understand its importance and impact in various areas. Through an exhaustive analysis and the presentation of relevant data, we are going to delve into Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Medal of Honor flag.png to unravel its implications and its scope in different contexts. Without a doubt, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Medal of Honor flag.png is a highly relevant topic that deserves careful examination, and that is precisely what we will do in the following pages. So get ready to embark on a fascinating journey through Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Medal of Honor flag.png.
This flag, which is something that I made recently, is probably one of the best flag illustrations that I have ever seen on Wikipedia. The qaulity of the image is better than what I have seen, and better than the quality that I replaced a few days ago. The image is currently used on the Medal of Honor article and was created, as mentioned earlier, by User:Zscout370.
Oppose, graphically very dull — Oska 07:07, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
Oppose, graphically very basic. --Chris 73Talk 11:54, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. I don't think images of flags are striking or informative enough to be featured. A photograph, however, might be. Mgm|(talk) 20:36, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. Far too small, far too boring. ed g2s • talk 23:52, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)