In today's article we are going to talk about Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:New Town, Edinburgh, Panorama.jpg, a topic that has undoubtedly sparked the interest of many people over time. This topic has been approached from different perspectives and has generated a wide debate in society. Over the years, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:New Town, Edinburgh, Panorama.jpg has been the subject of study and research, leading to important discoveries and advances in the field. In this article, we will explore the various facets of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:New Town, Edinburgh, Panorama.jpg and analyze its impact on different areas of life. In addition, we will examine some of the most relevant aspects related to Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:New Town, Edinburgh, Panorama.jpg, with the aim of providing a comprehensive and enriching vision on this topic.
Oppose. Thisglad, using a tripod would not fix the lack of sharpness. The issue is not with motion blur but with the camera's low quality optics/sensor. The only way to make the image sharper would be to take it with a better camera, really. Diliff | (Talk)(Contribs)12:53, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Oppose - for reasons of extremely low quality as stated above, although I would oppose based on the creator's (and nominator) conduct alone. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ18:19, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
