In this article, we will delve into the fascinating world of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Restless flycatcher02.jpg, exploring its multiple facets and its impact on different aspects of today's society. Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Restless flycatcher02.jpg has been an object of study and interest for many years, both for its historical relevance and for its influence in the contemporary world. Throughout the next lines, we will analyze in depth the different aspects that make Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Restless flycatcher02.jpg a topic of debate and reflection, as well as its relevance in different contexts and scenarios. From its impact on the economy to its influence on popular culture, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Restless flycatcher02.jpg has left a profound mark on people's lives, and it is essential to understand its importance in order to better understand the world around us.
A superb shot of this exciting bird. I say it's exciting because it exhibits probably the most sought after characteristic in a bird - the hover. This allows the photographer a chance - albeit a fairly slim one as the word "hover" is probably a bit liberal - of getting the bird on the wing. And it's this chance that keeps you hoping to get that perfect shot - and after countless near misses and two (or was it three?) days of shooting these two come pretty darn close.
Support alternative 1 Background on the first is a little distracting, but the alternative makes the bird stand out, and I really like the position of the wings. Clegs (talk) 06:03, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Support alt 1 Really great capture, I like the slight movement and the anatomical depiction of the species in flight is simply faultless. Niggles like slight oversharpening and the crop (I'd prefer a squarer one) really do pale in comparison. --mikaultalk10:17, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Support alt 1, displays a particular characteristic of the species in a clear and informative way. Aesthetically pleasing as well. The background is also very pleasing and non-distracting. Sam Barsoom20:22, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Support either—I think the first submission illustrates the body of the bird a lot better, whereas the alternative just looks cool...so cool...support either.—DMCer™02:14, 20 January 2008 (UTC)