Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Tubal Pregnancy with embryo.jpg
In today's world, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Tubal Pregnancy with embryo.jpg is a topic that arouses the interest and attention of a wide spectrum of individuals. Whether for its historical relevance, its impact on today's society, or its importance for the future, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Tubal Pregnancy with embryo.jpg has become a focal point of discussion and debate. Its influence extends to different areas, from politics and economics, to culture and entertainment. In this article we will explore various aspects related to Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Tubal Pregnancy with embryo.jpg, analyzing its evolution over time, its implications and possible implications for the contemporary world.
Support if only for the caption. If I had my way, all captions would be as informative as that one. I want to know everything about who what when where and why the photo was taken so that I can get as much as possible out of it. You would never see photos in textbooks or scientific journals with captions like we have on our FPs. Its something good to strive for.--Niro515:45, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Note from original photographer: Much thanks to all who have commented. I have taken the critique to heart and re-scanned the original 2001 Ektachrome transparency at higher resolution (1874x2000), then tried to reduce the noise (actually original film grain) in Photoshop. The upgraded image is now on my Flickr site at <http://www.flickr.com/photos/euthman/304334264/>. The image is still public domain, as are all my specimen images. I'm not sure if the upgrade delivers any more detail, as the original scan was pretty much at (or above) the resolution of my klooged macrophotography rig. (This is a really tiny embryo!) However, it does have smoother gradations, and the colors are more true-to-life.--Euthman15:12, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Thank you! Support large version, which I uploaded from Flickr to Wiki. I took the liberty to adjust the levels slightly - the image had grayish blacks. --Janke | Talk20:48, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Comment Thanks Janke for the color adjustment and the upload, you beat me to it by mere moments. I think that the second version is better, and looks really good at a small size, such as would be used in an article. I would like to replace the first image with the second, but I am unsure whether that is the proper protocol?? Could someone with more knowledge of the process let me know what to do? Also, I must be missing what specifically needs work in the caption? Thanks--DO11.1021:01, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
I'd go with WP:BOLD. The pictures are similar enough, with the new one being a clear improvement (IMO). Whats the worst that can happen? A revert. But then you can call us over for help ;-) --Dschwen09:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Done. The image shown on this page is the HIGH resolution image.