Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Bee pollenating a rose.jpg
The topic of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Bee pollenating a rose.jpg is one that has captured the attention of many people in recent years. With an increasingly focused focus on the importance of this topic, it is not surprising that studies and research on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Bee pollenating a rose.jpg are on the rise. From its origins to its impact on modern society, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Bee pollenating a rose.jpg remains a topic of debate and reflection today. As we explore this topic further, we encounter a number of perspectives and opinions that make us question our own beliefs and knowledge about Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Bee pollenating a rose.jpg. In this article, we will delve into the world of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Bee pollenating a rose.jpg and explore its relevance to our contemporary lives.
Keep. The composition and aesthetics of this image are exceptional. There's more to macro photography that DOF and resolution. Kaldari (talk) 16:20, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
How are they exceptional? I can't even see the details that make up the identification—- and it is all on composition. ZooFari21:16, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
What do you mean "make up the identification"? It is unidentified, but since it used to illustrate pollination, rather than the taxonomic group of the flower or insect, this is a bit less important. deBivort21:56, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
That's why it is unidentified. It does not display details enough to find the ID. And since there is no identification, there's no EV to support FP status. There are far more images showing pollination that includes the ID of the pollinator. Even if it was as you assert, this image is not the best illustration for pollination. ZooFari22:10, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
