In this article, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Control-of-stomach-acid-sec.png will be addressed from a multidisciplinary and updated perspective, in order to exhaustively analyze and understand all aspects related to this topic. A journey will be made through the historical background, the different current theories and approaches, as well as the practical and social implications that Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Control-of-stomach-acid-sec.png entails. It will seek to offer a complete and balanced vision that allows the reader to acquire comprehensive knowledge about this issue that is so relevant today.
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 May 2011 at 10:16:10 (UTC)
Reason
I am not convinced that this diagram, while clearly very useful, is a great choice as a featured picture. I do not feel that it would pass at FPC today for a number of reasons. Firstly, it is not in SVG format, which would be more that suitable. Secondly, the diagram is covered in somewhat random capitalisation- "Blood Circulation"? "Lumen of Body"? And so on. Thirdly, it is unreferenced; I know a lot of people prefer to see references for diagrams such as this. When placed side-by-side with other diagrams in the category (for instance, File:Circulatory System en.svg, File:Steroidogenesis.svg or File:Complete neuron cell diagram en.svg), it is not in the same league.
Delist per nom. Yeah, OK, although it's pretty well used after all these years, it's very diagrammatic compared to other illustrations, and looks like there's no chance of getting the creator to update it as he appears to have been gone for several years. I see on his talkpage at least one message suggesting this contains an error/s as well. --jjron (talk) 15:14, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
Comment The main arguments about titles and format seem like easy things to fix. I think rather than delisting if someone would step up and fix those things a D & R would be the better choice. Didn't there use to be a page for bringing to light pictures that needed work? Cat-five - talk20:01, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Changing this to svg will not be easy- it'll probably have to be completely redrawn. There's also the problem of the complete lack of visual interest and the possibility of errors. If someone is willing to do the work, great, but this should be delisted in the mean time. J Milburn (talk) 08:23, 28 May 2011 (UTC)