In this article, we will explore the fascinating world of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:Bush Cockroach.jpg. From its origins to its impact on modern society, we will take an in-depth look at all facets related to Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:Bush Cockroach.jpg. This topic has captured the attention of experts and fans alike, and throughout these pages we will analyze the most relevant aspects surrounding Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:Bush Cockroach.jpg. Whether from a historical, scientific, cultural or social perspective, this article offers a comprehensive vision that will allow the reader to understand the importance and scope of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:Bush Cockroach.jpg in today's world. We are sure that the information presented here will arouse the interest and curiosity of those who wish to deepen their knowledge about Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:Bush Cockroach.jpg.
Delist, though it's pretty much just procedural at this point. No articles = no FP, and an unidentified photo isn't appropriate for articles. Adam Cuerden(talk)Has about 6.9% of all FPs17:39, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
Delist Can we not have an automated process that removes FP from any image not in an article (for say a month) after photographer and nominator have been notified? Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:04, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
It may be worth giving a public chance for the image to be reinstated, and, rarely, there are cases where we feature, say, an image divided into parts (not that usable in articles, but best quality) and the still-pretty-big combined file. But maybe an expedited process, like, a list of proposed delists of that sort, that auto-delist if no-one objects? This'll help catch cases where, to give a couple recent examples, the wrong image of a set gets deleted when an image was moved to the infobox (Les Troyens), the image was replaced, usually by an IP, with a much poorer replacement (several cases), or where a delist-and-replace process would be better (The Currier-and-Ives Assassination of Lincoln, say). It also makes Wikibreaks a bit less dangerous. Adam Cuerden(talk)Has about 6.9% of all FPs19:55, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
