The _Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:Chambord pano.jpg__ is a topic that has captured the attention of millions of people around the world. From its discovery to its impact on modern society, this topic has generated interest and debate in different areas. In this article, we will explore the various aspects related to _Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:Chambord pano.jpg__, from its origins to its relevance today. We will analyze its influence on culture, science, politics, and even people's daily lives. In addition, we will examine the different perspectives and opinions that exist around this topic, with the aim of providing a comprehensive and detailed vision of its importance and impact on society. Join us on this journey of discovery and exploration about _Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:Chambord pano.jpg__!
I have no problem using two separate processes. Forcing D&R implies that FP status affords protection to an image in the article. It doesn't. Saffron Blaze (talk) 00:34, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
There is a major problem with using two separate processes when they end up keeping both images when they serve an identical purpose. J Milburn (talk) 08:41, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
Agree with J Milburn. Especially since almost exclusively, a D&R comes as a result of the old FP already having been superseded in an article by a superior image. In fact, I think FP status does afford some protection to an image in an article, if not dogmatically then at least in practice because many editors (even those not involved in FPC) do revert removal of FPs on the basis of them being featured. Ðiliff«»(Talk)09:00, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
But the current implementation of D&R under delist is not very fruitful. Please notice JJH's comment on the D&R request below: "I prefer not to do delist and replaces when nominating as it is tough to get a quorum". I think the best way is to consider a normal FPC as a D&R if anybody (including the nominator) add another FP there (just like an alt/edit) to replace. -- JKadavoorJee09:31, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
Probably not the best place to discuss it but I'd support reworking D/R's to be up with the rest of the nominations, it is essentially a nomination anyway.. — raekyt04:55, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
I'd also like to support if somebody (probably a more experienced user here) will raise a proposal at the talk page (I guess it is the right place). JKadavoorJee12:17, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
