This article will address the topic of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:Wounded Knee aftermath3.jpg, which is of great relevance and interest today. Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:Wounded Knee aftermath3.jpg is a topic that has captured the attention of a wide spectrum of the public, since its impact extends to various areas of society. Throughout the next few lines, different aspects related to Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:Wounded Knee aftermath3.jpg will be analyzed, from its origin to its influence today. Relevant research and studies on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:Wounded Knee aftermath3.jpg will be reviewed, as well as testimonies from experts in the field. The intention is to provide the reader with a complete and updated view on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:Wounded Knee aftermath3.jpg, thus allowing a deep and global understanding of this topic.
Nominating for delisting and replacement with a new final edit. Good news regarding this image: after the Library of Congress confirmed the discovery of human remains in the foreground (from last year's restoration) the Montréal Museum of Fine Art incorporated the update into official program notes for an exhibit about historic photography.
Yes, I read those, and I can identify no tangible improvement from one version to the next. I don't get any more detail on the bodies, the dark vertical band is spurious, and frankly, the snow is not the subject of the picture. The main impression I'm left with is that your proposed replacement has a grey cast, and the grain in the sky has been brought out = made worse. My personal opinion is that this is a lost cause - dark bodies on dark background, and if you think about it for a moment, this circumstance has actually become part of the history of the picture. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 23:35, 16 March 2010 (UTC)