In today's world, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:Yellow-faced Honeyeater nov07.jpg is a topic that generates great interest and debate. For decades, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:Yellow-faced Honeyeater nov07.jpg has captured the attention of experts in various fields, as well as the general public. Its impact on society, the economy and culture makes it a relevant topic worthy of analysis. In this article, we will explore different perspectives on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:Yellow-faced Honeyeater nov07.jpg and its influence in different areas. From its origin to its possible future consequences, we will delve into an exhaustive analysis of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:Yellow-faced Honeyeater nov07.jpg, providing a comprehensive view of the topic and its relevance today.
Comment My inclination on this one is that it's a very different pose and angle, so there might be a place for it, though I don't like the GDFL thing. I'm almost inclined to put it into the article for the image with the caption along the lines of "The bird has a very distinctive yellow streak below its eye", and see if it sticks. Adam Cuerden(talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs12:30, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
(This nom defaults to delist, since it's not used in articles, and, on the whole, I'm fine with that. I'm just bringing up the only option for salvaging its FP status) Adam Cuerden(talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs12:40, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Huh. Actually... and it's a bit late to realise this I know: @JJ Harrison: Isn't the image we just promoted Juvenile plumage? It lacks the black stripe under the yellow. Or is it a subspecies? Adam Cuerden(talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs12:49, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Delist - I still believe the images are too similar to have two featured pictures. Both images are good, but the recent promotion is excellent. Mattximus (talk) 01:34, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
There is not enough support to delist the current featured picture. As the image is still used (was added back in the article more than seven days ago), it can retain that status. ArmbrustTheHomunculus15:29, 4 February 2019 (UTC)