_ _    _ _____  ___   __                       
 __      _(_) | _(_)___ / ( _ ) / /_   ___ ___  _ __ ___  
 \ \ /\ / / | |/ / | |_ \ / _ \| '_ \ / __/ _ \| '_ ` _ \ 
  \ V  V /| |   <| |___) | (_) | (_) | (_| (_) | | | | | |
   \_/\_/ |_|_|\_\_|____/ \___/ \___(_)___\___/|_| |_| |_|

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image:Rolling-thunder-cloud.jpg

In today's world, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image:Rolling-thunder-cloud.jpg has become a topic of great relevance and interest to people of all ages and backgrounds. Whether due to its impact on society, its historical relevance or its influence on different aspects of daily life, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image:Rolling-thunder-cloud.jpg has captured the attention of many and has become a topic of study, debate and reflection. In this article, we will explore different aspects related to Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image:Rolling-thunder-cloud.jpg, from its origin and evolution to its influence today. We will analyze its impact in various areas, as well as the future perspectives it generates. Without a doubt, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image:Rolling-thunder-cloud.jpg is a topic that does not leave anyone indifferent and that deserves to be analyzed from different perspectives to understand its true scope in today's society.
Reason
It doesn't meet the 1000px size requirements, and it has a couple of artifacts.
Nominator
TheOtherSiguy
Keep on list We are becoming way to stringent about the rules. Haven't you guys read WP:IGNORE? This is a rare picture and a good one--Phoenix 15 22:07, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
WP:IGNORE states: "If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia, ignore it." How would the quality of Wikipedia be degraded if this picture is no longer featured? Cacophony 06:00, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delist A stunning composition, but just not enough detail. Storm clouds are not infrequent and they're often spectacular as a glance through the internet illustrates. Yes, this storm was a specific 'unique' event, but no more so than all the other unique storms that rage around the world. I understand Phoenix 15's arguments, but IMO we're going too far the other way - FPs should be the very, very best; maybe we need a "Good Picture" designation for pictures like this (and the ground squirrel above) so that we can recognize that they're above average pictures that are encyclopedic, but not quite at the very pinnacle of the picture material we have. 99.236.51.219 23:50, 5 October 2007 (UTC) Sorry, that was me; I've removed the strikethrough Matt Deres 13:48, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
IP users do not have suffrage. Cacophony 06:00, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
However, the comment is relevant. MER-C 08:39, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Well stated. TheOtherSiguy 00:59, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

No consensus MER-C 07:30, 15 October 2007 (UTC)