In today's world,
Wikipedia:Files for deletion/Replaceable fair use/File:Crumb self portrait.jpg has become a topic of great relevance and attention. Since its emergence,
Wikipedia:Files for deletion/Replaceable fair use/File:Crumb self portrait.jpg has captured the interest of experts, researchers and the general public, generating a wide range of debates, theories and opinions. Whether due to its impact on society, its influence on culture or its relevance in history,
Wikipedia:Files for deletion/Replaceable fair use/File:Crumb self portrait.jpg continues to be the object of analysis and discussion in various areas. In this article, we will explore the different aspects of
Wikipedia:Files for deletion/Replaceable fair use/File:Crumb self portrait.jpg, from its origin to its impact on today's world, in order to provide a comprehensive vision of this exciting and controversial topic.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of a fair use image as a replaceable image. Please do not modify it.
The result of the debate was to delete the image. Please see WP:NFC#UULP, specifically bullet point #1. Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:37, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
The image is a single, low-res (290x404) portrait, not even a full page of work, that could in no way hamper the artist's ability to profit from it; it shows both what the artist looks like while demonstrating the major aspects of his style (especially the pen-and-ink crosshatching that is his signature); no free equivalent of the artist's style is available. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Acidtoyman (talk • contribs) 00:36, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.