_ _    _ _____  ___   __                       
 __      _(_) | _(_)___ / ( _ ) / /_   ___ ___  _ __ ___  
 \ \ /\ / / | |/ / | |_ \ / _ \| '_ \ / __/ _ \| '_ ` _ \ 
  \ V  V /| |   <| |___) | (_) | (_) | (_| (_) | | | | | |
   \_/\_/ |_|_|\_\_|____/ \___/ \___(_)___\___/|_| |_| |_|

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/Replaceable fair use/File:Mary Pride.jpg

In today's world, Wikipedia:Files for deletion/Replaceable fair use/File:Mary Pride.jpg has become a topic of great relevance and interest to a wide spectrum of society. Since its discovery until today, Wikipedia:Files for deletion/Replaceable fair use/File:Mary Pride.jpg has been the subject of debate, study and research in different fields, which has contributed to expanding our knowledge about this phenomenon. In this article, we will delve into the exciting world of Wikipedia:Files for deletion/Replaceable fair use/File:Mary Pride.jpg, exploring its origins, its impact on society and possible future implications. There is no doubt that Wikipedia:Files for deletion/Replaceable fair use/File:Mary Pride.jpg has left an indelible mark on history and will continue to be an object of study and reflection for years to come.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of a fair use image as a replaceable image. Please do not modify it.

The result was to delete the image.

—Angr 13:08, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale

  • Person no longer makes public appearances since her legal controversy. I suppose someone could stalk her and catch her at the grocery store, but that actually violates laws where fair use does not. CyberAnth 09:08, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Given the above, it seems unreasonable to expect that a free image will become available. I think the image should stay. Nick Graves 16:23, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
  • I see no reliable source that she is actually a recluse. This is not J. D. Salinger we're talking about here. There's no reason to believe that she wouldn't provide a freely licensed photo or allow any sympathetic photographer to take one if she was contacted, so there's no argument that this photo is not replacable. It should be deleted. — coelacan talk — 21:40, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
    • Yea, it's Mary Pride. I have emailed her multiple times and mailed her twice in the past year to get such a photo. The request is never answered. Again, I point everyone to the legal controversy as reason for why this photo is not replacable. CyberAnth 00:29, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
    • In addition, there is evidence suggesting coelacan's nomination of this image is a bad faith one. He nominated the Mary Pride page for deletion and all of its images while his contribs indicate that he regularly edits pages that have images of living persons that are clear-cut cases for replacability.. Mary Pride is a founder of Quiverfull, a page where coelacan has made troublesome edits, e.g., this, and stated regarding them, "I thought the core of their beliefs was to fuck without ceasing (1 Thessalonians 5:17 ). You know, 'keep your wife's quiver full'", which can in no way be construed as good faith. What this all is really about is about WP:HARASS. CyberAnth 09:46, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.
Wikious
Boobota
Sagapedia