_ _    _ _____  ___   __                       
 __      _(_) | _(_)___ / ( _ ) / /_   ___ ___  _ __ ___  
 \ \ /\ / / | |/ / | |_ \ / _ \| '_ \ / __/ _ \| '_ ` _ \ 
  \ V  V /| |   <| |___) | (_) | (_) | (_| (_) | | | | | |
   \_/\_/ |_|_|\_\_|____/ \___/ \___(_)___\___/|_| |_| |_|

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/MediaWiki:Sandbox.js

In this article, we will explore in depth the topic of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/MediaWiki:Sandbox.js and its implications in today's society. From its origins to its impact today, we will analyze the different aspects related to Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/MediaWiki:Sandbox.js and its relevance in different areas. Through careful research and analysis, we will seek to better understand the role Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/MediaWiki:Sandbox.js plays in our lives and how it influences the way we think, act, and relate to the world around us. Additionally, we will closely examine expert opinions and current trends regarding Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/MediaWiki:Sandbox.js, in order to provide a comprehensive and up-to-date view on this highly relevant topic.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. This requires an interface admin, so I've submitted an edit request. Anyone needing this to be userfied or restored is welcome to ask at WP:IANB; no need to consult me. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:01, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

MediaWiki:Sandbox.js (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Opening a discussion here because it seems like the most appropriate place -- should this be userfied? It was used for a test in 2010, blanked in 2020, and I guess four years later it's still just kind of sitting around as a blank page. I don't know what the proper protocol is with MediaWiki pages, but are we supposed to just have random blank pages in that namespace? I don't think it should be deleted (despite this being a MfD), for what it's worth, I just think it might not need to be in MW:.jp×g🗯️ 08:36, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Soft delete on the premise that nobody cares about this old test. Userfy on request. SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:32, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.