_ _    _ _____  ___   __                       
 __      _(_) | _(_)___ / ( _ ) / /_   ___ ___  _ __ ___  
 \ \ /\ / / | |/ / | |_ \ / _ \| '_ \ / __/ _ \| '_ ` _ \ 
  \ V  V /| |   <| |___) | (_) | (_) | (_| (_) | | | | | |
   \_/\_/ |_|_|\_\_|____/ \___/ \___(_)___\___/|_| |_| |_|

Suntrust Bank v. Houghton Mifflin Co.

In this article, we will explore Suntrust Bank v. Houghton Mifflin Co. from different perspectives, delving into its importance, impact and relevance in today's society. Suntrust Bank v. Houghton Mifflin Co. is a topic that has captured the attention of experts and fans alike, and through this detailed analysis, we seek to shed light on its many facets. From its history to its future, through its implications in culture, politics and the economy, we will enter a universe of possibilities and challenges. Get ready to discover everything you need to know about Suntrust Bank v. Houghton Mifflin Co. and its influence on the modern world.

Suntrust Bank v. Houghton Mifflin Co.
CourtUnited States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Full case nameSuntrust Bank, as Trustee of the Stephen Mitchell trusts f.b.o. Eugene Muse Mitchell and Joseph Reynolds Mitchell v. Houghton Mifflin Company
Decided10 October 2001
Citation(s)268 F.3d 1257
Case history
Prior history136 F.Supp.2d 1357
Court membership
Judge(s) sittingBirch, Marcus, Wood (of the 7th Cir., sitting by designation)
Case opinions
MajorityBirch, joined by a unanimous court
ConcurrenceMarcus

Suntrust Bank v. Houghton Mifflin Co., 268 F.3d 1257 (11th Cir. 2001), was a case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit against the owner of Margaret Mitchell's 1936 novel Gone with the Wind, vacating an injunction prohibiting the publisher of Alice Randall's 2001 parody, The Wind Done Gone, from distributing the book.

The Court of Appeals recognized copyright in several characters from Gone with the Wind and found that The Wind Done Gone had "appropriate numerous characters, settings, and plot twists". However, the court decided that this appropriation was protected under the doctrine of fair use.

This case arguably stands for the principle that the creation and publication of a carefully written parody novel in the United States counts as fair use. In permitting parody without permission, the decision followed the 1994 United States Supreme Court decision in Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. which ruled that 2 Live Crew's unlicensed use of the bass line from Roy Orbison's song "Oh, Pretty Woman" could constitute fair use even though the work was a commercial use, and extended that principle from songs to novels. It is binding precedent in the Eleventh Circuit.

Mitchell's estate chose to drop the suit after publisher Houghton agreed to make a donation to Morehouse College.

See also

References

  1. ^ a b Suntrust Bank v. Houghton Mifflin Co., 268 F.3d 1257 (11th Cir. 2001).
  2. ^ "Mitchell Estate Settles Gone With the Wind Suit," The New York Times May 10, 2002; Settlement reached over Wind Done Gone, The Associated Press, May 10, 2002.

External links

Wikious
Boobota
Sagapedia