_ _    _ _____  ___   __                       
 __      _(_) | _(_)___ / ( _ ) / /_   ___ ___  _ __ ___  
 \ \ /\ / / | |/ / | |_ \ / _ \| '_ \ / __/ _ \| '_ ` _ \ 
  \ V  V /| |   <| |___) | (_) | (_) | (_| (_) | | | | | |
   \_/\_/ |_|_|\_\_|____/ \___/ \___(_)___\___/|_| |_| |_|

Third World Quarterly

The issue of Third World Quarterly is one of the most relevant issues today, with repercussions in various areas of society. From its origins to its impact on daily life, Third World Quarterly has generated passionate debates and has been the subject of numerous studies and research. In this article, we will explore different aspects related to Third World Quarterly, analyzing its historical importance, its influence on popular culture and its relevance today. Additionally, we will examine the possible future implications of Third World Quarterly and possible solutions to the challenges it poses. Join us on this exciting journey through the world of Third World Quarterly!

Third World Quarterly
DisciplineArea studies, development studies
LanguageEnglish
Edited byShahid Qadir
Publication details
History1979–present
Publisher
Taylor & Francis on behalf of Global South Ltd
FrequencyMonthly
2.255 (2021)
Standard abbreviations
ISO 4Third World Q.
Indexing
ISSN0143-6597 (print)
1360-2241 (web)
LCCN80640150
JSTOR01436597
OCLC no.615555785
Links

Third World Quarterly is a peer-reviewed academic journal managed by Global South Ltd and published by Taylor & Francis. Its "founding editor" and chair of its editorial board is Shahid Qadir, who is also one of two directors of Global South Ltd. Although the journal's title suggests only four issues per year, it is in fact published monthly. The journal had an impact factor of 2.225 in 2021.

Controversy

In September 2017, the journal attracted controversy after it published an article entitled "The Case for Colonialism" by political scientist Bruce Gilley. This article was described by Portia Roelofs and Max Gallien of the London School of Economics as "a travesty, the academic equivalent of a Trump tweet, clickbait with footnotes." Oxford theologian Nigel Biggar himself became the subject of controversy after defending Gilley's article.

On 19 September 2017, a large number of the journal's editorial board resigned in protest, citing a flawed peer review process for the colonialism submission and inaccurate statements from the editor-in-chief, Shahid Qadir. In all, 15 of the 34 members of the international editorial board were signatories to the resignation letter, and a petition to retract the piece at Change.org had more than 10,000 supporters. Board member Noam Chomsky opposed the retraction, saying: "Rebuttal offers a great opportunity for education, not only in this case."

References

  1. ^ a b c d "Third World Quarterly". Taylor & Francis. Retrieved 8 April 2023.
  2. ^ "GLOBAL SOUTH LTD overview – Find and update company information – GOV.UK". find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk. Retrieved 8 April 2023.
  3. ^ "Global South Ltd". Endole Insight.
  4. ^ "Third World Quarterly | Journal metrics". Taylor & Francis. Retrieved 8 April 2023.
  5. ^ Flaherty, Colleen (26 September 2017). "Author of ;Third World Quarterly' article on colonialism wants it stricken from the record, but it might not be going anywhere". Inside Higher Education. Retrieved 14 May 2019.
  6. ^ Thomas, Rosamma (19 September 2017). "Journal's editorial board resigns over colonialism essay". The Times of India. Retrieved 19 September 2017.
  7. ^ Flaherty, Colleen (19 September 2017). "Controversy over a paper in favor of colonialism sparks calls for retraction". Inside Higher Education. Retrieved 19 September 2017.
  8. ^ Zamudio-Suaréz, Fernanda (20 September 2017). "Editorial Board of 'Third World Quarterly' Resigns". The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved 23 September 2017.
  9. ^ Flaherty, Colleen (20 September 2017). "Resignations at 'Third World Quarterly'". Inside Higher Education. Retrieved 14 May 2019.

External links